Sarah C

Knowledge Areas : Crafts, Making and Tinkering, Horror, Literary Fiction, Magical Realism, Thrillers

Reputation Score: 656

Submit An Answer

Answers ( 1 )

 
  1. J Starr 4425 Community Answer

    Likely not enough to change much.

    The difference is less about muscle mass- or even muscle mass v fat mass by ratio-  but that muscles which are used (this sounds nearly primitive) taste better. There are some studies going on which demonstrate some differences in skeletal muscle nutrients, but so far, it's inconclusive-  it's just too soon and, frankly, doesn't appear to make enough of a difference- nutrion-wise-  at this time.

    The positives for free-range chicken farming are more about the environment, and overall humane treatment,  But it is easy to be fooled: Free range or cage free are not strictly defined, so that a chicken provided with two-square feet of dirt flooring an hour a day can be considered cage-free.  Organic means a bit more- but not much. There's even "Humane cage free" which indicates the chicken was raised in a grassy yard area and allowed to roam somewhat, at least.


    Here is an study on nutrients in cage-free v factory raised: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093180/   Table 2 shows you the difference in nutrient percentages.  Before you think the word "significant" in the opening paragraph means much, Table 2 tells you it means a mere 1%.  Statistically significant, but not nutritively significant.

    And, here's an article about the different grades and types being marketed: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/free-range-chicken#comparison  I find the publisher to be a bit au courant marketing-wise, but they do not outright base their articles on pseudoscience. 

    shrug  Personally, I buy free-range organic when I don't nearly-faint from the price- it is, after all, a bird that will eat dirt if there is nothing else available and the muscle meat will still be muscle meat-  because they taste like actual chicken.  It seems to me the factory grown birds taste mostly of wet kleenex, and I always have to add bouillon to the stock to make gravy.

    It turns out, good nutrition isn't about one meal, or one day's worth of meals, or even a couple days of meals, but over all, sometimes great, sometimes so-so, sometimes deliciously junk-food-filled, month after month so it becomes year after year of different nutrients in different proportions.

    Just eat- all the foods, and mind your portions. 

    UTC 2021-02-26 04:44 PM 0 Comments

To answer this question, you must be logged in.

Create an account

Already have an account? Login.

By Signing up, you indicate that you have read and agree to Sage's Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy